×

 

Fed report shows U.S. industrial production improved 0.1% in February

RP news wires

Industrial production edged up 0.1 percent in February following a gain of 0.9 percent in January, the Federal Reserve announced on March 15. Production was likely held down somewhat by winter storms in the Northeast. Manufacturing decreased 0.2 percent in February, with mixed results among its major industries. The output of mines rose 2.0 percent, while the index for utilities rose 0.5 percent. At 101.0 percent of its 2002 average, industrial output in February was 1.7 percent above its year-earlier level. Capacity utilization for total industry moved up 0.2 percentage point to 72.7 percent, a rate 7.9 percentage points below its average from 1972 to 2009.

 

INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION AND CAPACITY UTILIZATION: SUMMARY
Seasonally adjusted
 
 
Industrial production
2002=100 Percent change
2009 2010 2009 2010 Feb. '09 to
Feb. '10
Sept.[r] Oct.[r] Nov.[r] Dec.[r] Jan.[r] Feb.[p] Sept.[r] Oct.[r] Nov.[r] Dec.[r] Jan.[r] Feb.[p]
       
Total index   98.7   98.9   99.5  100.0  100.9  101.0     .6     .2     .7     .5     .9     .1    1.7
   Previous estimates   98.7   98.9   99.5  100.1  101.1           .6     .2     .6     .7     .9    
       
Major market groups      
Final Products  102.1  102.9  102.8  103.3  104.5  104.4     .8     .8    -.1     .4    1.1    -.1    1.7
   Consumer goods   99.4  100.3  100.2  100.4  101.3  100.9    1.0     .8    -.1     .2     .9    -.4    2.2
   Business equipment  108.8  109.6  109.4  110.6  112.3  112.8    -.1     .8    -.2    1.1    1.6     .4    -.7
Nonindustrial supplies   90.7   90.4   90.9   91.3   91.7   91.8    -.3    -.4     .6     .4     .5     .0   -1.5
   Construction   81.7   80.2   81.4   79.6   80.5   80.8   -1.5   -1.7    1.4   -2.2    1.1     .3   -4.5
Materials   98.5   98.3   99.8  100.3  101.1  101.4     .7    -.2    1.5     .5     .8     .3    2.9
       
Major industry groups      
Manufacturing (see note below)   97.7   97.6   98.6   98.4   99.3   99.1     .7    -.1    1.0    -.2     .9    -.2    1.5
   Previous estimates   97.7   97.6   98.5   98.5   99.4           .6    -.1    1.0    -.1    1.0    
Mining   96.8   96.8   98.9   98.5   99.5  101.5    -.2     .0    2.2    -.4    1.1    2.0     .2
Utilities  103.9  106.7  104.1  109.8  110.5  111.1     .5    2.6   -2.5    5.5     .6     .5    4.4

 

 
 
 
 
 
Capacity utilization
 
Percent of capacity
Capacity
growth
Average
1972-
2009
1988-
89
high
1990-
91
low
1994-
95
high
2001-
02
low
 
2009
Feb.
   
2009 2010 Feb. '09 to
Feb. '10
Sept.[r] Oct.[r] Nov.[r] Dec.[r] Jan.[r] Feb.[p]
       
Total industry   80.6   85.1   78.7   84.9   73.5   70.6   70.6   70.8   71.4   71.8   72.5   72.7   -1.2
   Previous estimates                                       70.6   70.9   71.3   71.9   72.6            
       
Manufacturing (see note below)   79.2   85.4   77.2   84.5   71.4   67.1   67.6   67.6   68.4   68.4   69.1   69.0   -1.4
   Previous estimates                                       67.6   67.6   68.4   68.4   69.2            
Mining   87.5   86.5   83.8   89.1   84.9   87.1   83.8   83.8   85.8   85.5   86.4   88.2   -1.0
Utilities   86.6   92.8   84.2   93.3   84.2   81.1   78.4   80.4   78.3   82.5   82.8   83.1    1.9
       
Stage-of-process groups      
Crude   86.5   88.3   84.7   89.9   81.7   81.7   83.6   83.1   84.5   84.8   85.3   86.2   -1.5
Primary and semifinished   81.6   86.5   77.9   87.9   74.3   68.5   67.5   67.8   68.2   69.0   69.4   69.6   -1.2
Finished   77.5   83.0   77.2   80.3   70.0   68.6   69.2   69.4   69.9   70.0   71.0   70.8    -.8

r Revised. p Preliminary

Market Groups 
The production of consumer goods fell 0.4 percent in February. The index for consumer durables fell 2.3 percent, while the index for consumer nondurables edged up 0.1 percent. The decline in consumer durables was led by a drop of 4.4 percent in automotive products; other major components registered small declines. Despite the decrease in February, the output of consumer durables was up 9.2 percent from its year-earlier level as a result of an increase of 27.0 percent in automotive products; the indexes for the other major components of consumer durables were below their year-earlier levels. Among consumer non-durables in February, the output of non-energy goods fell 0.3 percent, with declines in all of the index's major components, while the output of energy goods increased 1.1 percent. The gain for consumer energy goods largely reflected a rebound in the production of refined petroleum products, which had decreased in the previous two months.

The output of business equipment rose 0.4 percent in February but remained 0.7 percent below its year-earlier level. Information processing equipment advanced 1.2 percent, about its average rate of increase over the previous three months. Industrial and other equipment moved up 0.3 percent. Transit equipment fell 0.9 percent, the fifth consecutive monthly decline for this index.

The production of defense and space equipment rose 1.3 percent in February and was 5.7 percent above its year-earlier level.

Within non-industrial supplies, the output of construction supplies moved up 0.3 percent in February but was 4.5 percent below its year-earlier level. The production of business supplies edged down 0.1 percent after having risen for eight consecutive months.

The production of materials increased 0.3 percent in February. The index for non-energy materials edged down 0.1 percent; the output of durables was unchanged while non-durables fell 0.2 percent. Among the indexes for durable materials, consumer parts declined 0.8 percent, while equipment parts moved up 0.2 percent and other durable materials edged up 0.1 percent. Among major indexes for nondurable materials, textile materials advanced 1.5 percent, paper materials rose 0.4 percent, and chemical materials fell 0.7 percent. The index for energy materials rose 1.1 percent for its eighth consecutive monthly gain, with increases in coal mining and in support activities for oil and gas operations contributing significantly to the advance.

Industry Groups 
In February, manufacturing output fell 0.2 percent after having risen 0.9 percent in January; the level of output in February was 1.5 percent above its year-earlier level. Capacity utilization for manufacturing edged down 0.1 percentage point in February to 69.0 percent, a rate 3.9 percentage points above its trough in June 2009 but 10.2 percentage points below its average for the period from 1972 to 2009.

The output of durable goods fell 0.3 percent in February, after having risen 1.7 percent in January, and was 2.1 percent above its year-earlier level. In February, motor vehicles and parts fell 4.4 percent and nonmetallic mineral products declined 1.6 percent; computer and electronic products rose 1.0 percent and electrical equipment, appliances and components increased 0.9 percent. The indexes for primary metals, furniture and related products, and miscellaneous manufacturing fell slightly, while the indexes for wood products, fabricated metal products, machinery, and aerospace and miscellaneous transportation equipment rose slightly.

Non-durable manufacturing edged down 0.1 percent in February, after having risen 0.4 percent in January, and was 1.9 percent above its year-earlier level. The largest change in February was an increase of 2.2 percent for petroleum and coal products; results were mixed among other major components of non-durables.

In February, mining output gained 2.0 percent, and capacity utilization rose to 88.2 percent, a rate 0.7 percentage point above its average for the period from 1972 to 2009. The output of utilities rose 0.5 percent, as an increase in electric utilities more than offset a decline in natural gas utilities. Capacity utilization for utilities rose 0.3 percentage point to 83.1 percent, a rate 3.5 percentage points below its average for the period from 1972 to 2009.

Capacity utilization rates in February at industries grouped by stage of process were as follows: At the crude stage, utilization increased 0.9 percentage point to 86.2 percent, a rate 0.3 percentage point below its average for the period from 1972 to 2009; at the primary and semifinished stages, utilization rose 0.2 percentage point to 69.6 percent, a rate 12.0 percentage points below its long-run average; while at the finished stage, utilization edged down 0.2 percentage point to 70.8 percent, a rate 6.7 percentage points below its long-run average.

 

Ascii Screen reader Summary: Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization
Chart   Chart 1: Industrial Production, Capacity, and Capacity Utilization
Chart   Chart 2: Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization
Chart   Chart 3: Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization, High Technology Industries
Ascii Screen reader Table 1: Industrial Production: Market and Industry Groups (percent change)
Ascii Screen reader Table 2: Industrial Production: Special Aggregates and Selected Detail (percent change)
Ascii Screen reader Table 3: Motor Vehicle Assemblies
Ascii Screen reader Table 4: Industrial Production Indexes: Market and Industry Group Summary
Ascii Screen reader Table 5: Industrial Production Indexes: Special Aggregates
Ascii Screen reader Table 6: Diffusion Indexes of Industrial Production
Ascii Screen reader Table 7: Capacity Utilization: Manufacturing, Mining, and Utilities
Ascii Screen reader Table 8: Industrial Capacity: Manufacturing, Mining, and Utilities (percent change)
Ascii Screen reader Table 9: Industrial Production: Gross Value of Products and Nonindustrial Supplies
Ascii Screen reader Table 10: Gross-Value-Weighted Industrial Production: Stage-of-Process Groups
Ascii Screen reader Table 11: Historical Statistics for IP, Capacity, and Utilization: Total Industry
Ascii Screen reader Table 12: Historical Statistics for IP, Capacity, and Utilization: Manufacturing
Ascii Screen reader Table 13: Historical Statistics for IP, Capacity, and Utilization: Total Industry excluding Selected High-Technology Industries
Ascii Screen reader Table 14: Historical Statistics for IP, Capacity, and Utilization: Manufacturing excluding Selected High-Technology Industries
Subscribe to Machinery Lubrication

About the Author