×

 

Industrial production jumped 1.2% in May; capacity utilization rose 1.0%

RP news wires

Industrial production advanced 1.2 percent in May after having risen 0.7 percent in April, the Federal Reserve Bank announced on June 16. Manufacturing output climbed 0.9 percent last month, its third consecutive monthly gain of about 1 percent, and was 7.9 percent above its year-earlier level. Outside of manufacturing, the output of mines edged down 0.2 percent, and the output of utilities increased 4.8 percent. The jump in utilities reflected unseasonably warm temperatures that boosted air conditioning usage in May after uncharacteristically temperate weather in April reduced heating demand. At 103.5 percent of its 2002 average, total industrial output in May was 7.6 percent above its year-earlier level. The capacity utilization rate for total industry rose 1.0 percentage point to 74.7 percent, a rate 6.2 percentage points above the rate from a year earlier but 5.9 percentage points below its average from 1972 to 2009.

 

INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION AND CAPACITY UTILIZATION: SUMMARY
Seasonally adjusted
 
 
Industrial production
2002=100 Percent change
2009
Dec.[r]
2010 2009
Dec.[r]
2010 May '09 to
May '10
Jan.[r] Feb.[r] Mar.[r] Apr.[r] May[p] Jan.[r] Feb.[r] Mar.[r] Apr.[r] May[p]
       
Total index  100.2  101.3  101.3  101.6  102.3  103.5     .7    1.1    -.1     .3     .7    1.2    7.6
   Previous estimates  100.2  101.4  101.2  101.5  102.3           .7    1.2    -.1     .2     .8    
       
Major market groups      
Final Products  103.7  105.4  104.8  105.5  105.9  107.1     .8    1.6    -.6     .7     .4    1.1    7.6
   Consumer goods  101.0  102.6  101.5  101.9  101.9  103.0     .7    1.6   -1.0     .4    -.1    1.2    6.3
   Business equipment  110.6  112.0  112.3  113.5  115.4  116.9    1.2    1.2     .2    1.1    1.6    1.3   10.1
Nonindustrial supplies   91.4   91.9   91.3   91.2   92.4   93.8     .4     .5    -.7    -.1    1.3    1.4    3.6
   Construction   79.4   80.7   80.3   82.2   84.7   85.3   -2.7    1.7    -.5    2.3    3.1     .8    3.9
Materials  100.3  101.2  101.9  101.8  102.6  104.0     .6     .8     .7     .0     .8    1.3    9.2
       
Major industry groups      
Manufacturing (see note below)   98.5   99.4   99.3  100.5  101.4  102.3    -.1     .9     .0    1.2     .9     .9    7.9
   Previous estimates   98.5   99.4   99.4  100.4  101.4          -.1    1.0    -.1    1.0    1.0    
Mining   97.0   99.9  101.6  102.8  104.3  104.2   -1.6    2.9    1.7    1.2    1.5    -.2    9.6
Utilities  112.0  113.7  112.0  105.1  103.7  108.7    7.7    1.5   -1.5   -6.2   -1.3    4.8    4.2

 

 
 
 
 
 
Capacity utilization
 
Percent of capacity
Capacity
growth
Average
1972-
2009
1988-
89
high
1990-
91
low
1994-
95
high
2001-
02
low
 
2009
May
   
2009
Dec.[r]
2010 May '09 to
May '10
Jan.[r] Feb.[r] Mar.[r] Apr.[r] May[p]
       
Total industry   80.6   85.1   78.7   84.9   73.5   68.5   72.0   72.8   72.8   73.1   73.7   74.7   -1.3
   Previous estimates                                       71.9   72.8   72.8   73.1   73.7            
       
Manufacturing (see note below)   79.2   85.4   77.2   84.5   71.4   65.3   68.4   69.1   69.2   70.1   70.8   71.5   -1.4
   Previous estimates                                       68.4   69.2   69.2   70.0   70.8            
Mining   87.5   86.5   83.8   89.1   84.9   81.9   84.3   86.7   88.2   89.4   90.7   90.6   -1.0
Utilities   86.6   92.8   84.2   93.3   84.2   79.2   84.1   85.2   83.8   78.5   77.3   81.0    1.9
       
Stage-of-process groups      
Crude   86.5   88.3   84.7   89.9   81.7   79.8   84.1   85.5   86.6   87.5   88.4   88.1   -1.6
Primary and semifinished   81.6   86.5   77.9   87.9   74.3   65.9   69.3   69.9   69.9   69.6   70.3   71.9   -1.3
Finished   77.5   83.0   77.2   80.3   70.0   67.0   70.1   71.1   70.8   71.6   71.8   72.4    -.6

r Revised. p Preliminary.

Market Groups
The output of nearly all major market groups rose in May. The production of consumer goods increased 1.2 percent, boosted by higher output of both consumer durables and nondurables. Within consumer durables, which jumped 2.6 percent, large gains in the indexes for automotive products, home electronics, and miscellaneous goods were only slightly offset by a small loss in the index for appliances, furniture, and carpeting. The production of consumer non-durable goods moved up 0.8 percent. The output of non-energy nondurables rose 0.5 percent; all of the major categories for that index recorded increases except chemical products, which fell 1.1 percent. The output of consumer energy products moved up 1.6 percent, with gains in all of its components other than automotive gasoline, which fell sharply.

The output of business equipment rose 1.3 percent in May, a pace on par with the average monthly gain during the previous two months and somewhat above its average increase earlier in the recovery. The output of transit equipment climbed 2.5 percent following a decrease of 1.6 percent in April. The increase in May primarily resulted from higher output of trucks, which more than offset losses in civilian aircraft. Elsewhere in business equipment, the index for information processing equipment rose 0.9 percent, and the index for industrial and other equipment increased 1.2 percent. The output indexes for both of these categories have advanced substantially since last fall; gains in semiconductor manufacturing equipment and construction machinery have contributed significantly to the improvement in the industrial and other equipment category.

In May, the output of defense and space equipment moved down after four consecutive monthly increases. A strike at a producer of military cargo planes accounted for the loss.

Within nonindustrial supplies, the output of construction supplies increased 0.8 percent in May after two consecutive months of larger gains. The production of business supplies rose 1.7 percent in May, the second consecutive monthly increase after declining earlier in the year.

The output of materials to be further processed in the industrial sector increased 1.3 percent in May after having risen about 0.6 percent per month since the beginning of the year; the index in May was 9.2 percent above its year-earlier level. The production of durable materials climbed 2.0 percent, with widespread solid gains within consumer parts, equipment parts, and other durable materials. By contrast, the output of nondurable materials was unchanged in May, with a decline in chemical materials offsetting a small gain in paper materials and strong gains in both textile materials and other nondurable materials. The index for energy materials climbed 1.8 percent in May; most of its components advanced, with the notable exception of coal mining, which fell 5.9 percent.

Industry Groups 
Manufacturing output rose 0.9 percent in May, the same pace as in April. Capacity utilization for manufacturing moved up 0.7 percentage point to 71.5 percent, a rate 6.4 percentage points above its trough in June 2009, but 7.7 percentage points below its average from 1972 to 2009.

The production index for durable goods advanced 1.7 percent in May; most major categories of durables strengthened. Sizable gains were recorded for wood products, primary metals, fabricated metal products, machinery, motor vehicles and parts, and furniture and related products.

The index for nondurable manufacturing was unchanged in May. Losses in chemicals, petroleum and coal products, and apparel and leather offset increases elsewhere. The largest gains among the major categories of nondurables were for printing and support, which advanced 1.7 percent, and for textile and product mills, which increased 1.4 percent. Production in the non-NAICS manufacturing industries (logging and publishing) rose 1.8 percent.

In May, mining output edged down 0.2 percent, and capacity utilization edged down to 90.6 percent, a rate 3.1 percentage points above its average for the period from 1972 to 2009. The small loss in mining production mainly reflected declines in coal mining and in stone, sand, and gravel quarrying. The output of utilities climbed 4.8 percent, and capacity utilization for utilities increased 3.7 percentage points to 81.0 percent, a rate 5.6 percentage points below its average for the period from 1972 to 2009.

Capacity utilization rates in May at industries grouped by stage of process were as follows: At the crude stage, utilization decreased 0.3 percentage point to 88.1 percent, a rate 1.6 percentage points above its average for the period from 1972 to 2009; at the primary and semifinished stages, utilization rose 1.6 percentage points to 71.9 percent, a rate 9.7 percentage points below its long-run average; and at the finished stage, utilization increased 0.6 percentage point to 72.4 percent, a rate 5.1 percentage points below its long-run average.

 

Ascii Screen reader Summary: Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization
Chart   Chart 1: Industrial Production, Capacity, and Capacity Utilization
Chart   Chart 2: Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization
Chart   Chart 3: Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization, High Technology Industries
Ascii Screen reader Table 1: Industrial Production: Market and Industry Groups (percent change)
Ascii Screen reader Table 2: Industrial Production: Special Aggregates and Selected Detail (percent change)
Ascii Screen reader Table 3: Motor Vehicle Assemblies
Ascii Screen reader Table 4: Industrial Production Indexes: Market and Industry Group Summary
Ascii Screen reader Table 5: Industrial Production Indexes: Special Aggregates
Ascii Screen reader Table 6: Diffusion Indexes of Industrial Production
Ascii Screen reader Table 7: Capacity Utilization: Manufacturing, Mining, and Utilities
Ascii Screen reader Table 8: Industrial Capacity: Manufacturing, Mining, and Utilities (percent change)
Ascii Screen reader Table 9: Industrial Production: Gross Value of Products and Nonindustrial Supplies
Ascii Screen reader Table 10: Gross-Value-Weighted Industrial Production: Stage-of-Process Groups
Ascii Screen reader Table 11: Historical Statistics for IP, Capacity, and Utilization: Total Industry
Ascii Screen reader Table 12: Historical Statistics for IP, Capacity, and Utilization: Manufacturing
Ascii Screen reader Table 13: Historical Statistics for IP, Capacity, and Utilization: Total Industry excluding Selected High-Technology Industries
Ascii Screen reader Table 14: Historical Statistics for IP, Capacity, and Utilization: Manufacturing excluding Selected High-Technology Industries
Subscribe to Machinery Lubrication

About the Author